Featured weekly article: ‘Papa’– Nursultan Nazarbayev and the Discourse of Charismatic Leadership and Nation‐Building in Post‐Soviet Kazakhstan

‘Papa’– Nursultan Nazarbayev and the Discourse of Charismatic Leadership and Nation‐Building in Post‐Soviet Kazakhstan

By Rico Isaacs

Volume 10, Issue 3, pages 435-452

Abstract

Taking a critical perspective on the Weberian concept of charisma this article examines elite and citizen discourse regarding the perceived charismatic leadership and nation‐building achievements of the post‐Soviet president of Kazakhstan, Nursultan Nazarbayev. Using a number of ideal type features of charismatic leadership based on the typology developed by Roger Eatwell, the article argues that Nazarbayev’s leadership does not fit neatly the concept of charisma. Rather, in this instance, Nazarbayev’s perceived charismatic leadership as the father of the Kazakhstani nation, and the single politician capable of meeting the challenges of post‐Soviet nation‐building, is a constructed discursive force projected from above at the elite level, which resonates with public attitudes towards him at the societal level. Charisma represents a discursive mechanism that emphasises President Nazarbayev’s centrality to the unity, prosperity, and stability of the nation. This charismatic discourse has aided Nazarbayev in consolidating his authoritarian regime and illustrates the existence of a distinct form of post‐Soviet charisma.

Read the full article here.

Featured weekly article: From Registers to Repertoires of Identification in National Identity Discourses: A Comparative Study of Nationally Mixed People in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom

From Registers to Repertoires of Identification in National Identity Discourses: A Comparative Study of Nationally Mixed People in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom

By Anne Unterreiner

Volume 15, Issue 2, pages 252-271

Abstract

As nationally mixed people have parents born in different countries, they can potentially identify with multiple national reference groups, allowing the researcher to study national identification processes. The analysis of approximately one hundred people of nationally mixed background living in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom highlights different registers of identification. There are important differences in how nationally mixed people articulate them, which leads to the identification of different national repertoires of identification. In France, a strong French national identity was emphasized, whereas German national identity seems more fragile because it depends mainly on cultural socialization. In the United Kingdom, non‐national identities are developed in a context where the national community is not clearly defined, while ethnicity is publicly recognized. The register and repertoire of identification concepts thus allow the researcher to analyse identity discourses and then explain national differences through international comparison.

Read the full article here.

Featured weekly article: Generating Martyrdom: Forgetting the War in Contemporary Algeria

Generating Martyrdom: Forgetting the War in Contemporary Algeria

By Judith Scheele

Volume 6, Issue 2, pages 180-194

Abstract

Nationalist displays and rhetoric invoking the Algerian war of independence from France (1954–1962) are omnipresent in contemporary Algeria. Yet personal memories of the war of independence are conspicuously absent locally, although the war generation is still alive, and although all current power‐holders and their contenders tend to refer to the war as the supreme source of political legitimacy. This article explores this apparent paradox with special reference to Kabylia, a Berber‐speaking area in northeastern Algeria. It argues that the local absence of war history is crucial for its functioning as a national myth; that this local indeterminacy allows for an implicit and constant re‐negotiation of local hierarchies although they superficially refer to moral absolutes; but that it also imposes an inherently restrictive model of political legitimacy and protest.

Read the full article here.

Featured weekly article: Ethnic Politics, Political Elite, and Regime Change in Nigeria

Ethnic Politics, Political Elite, and Regime Change in Nigeria

By Henry Ani Kifordu

Volume 11, Issue 3, pages 427-450

Abstract

Since the 1960s, intermittent social conflicts in Nigeria appear mostly linked to ethnic groups’ differences. Considering the importance of regime change in social and political stability, this article critically analyses the historic and dynamic role of the core political executive elite in the political system’s stability. The article argues that ethnic politics persist in Nigeria based on the nature of interactions between political institutions, institution‐builders, and society. It asserts a contradictory link between deep‐rooted elite interests and popular preferences in ways that undermine orientations towards democracy. The empirical focus is on the composite nature of the core political executive elite analysed through their ethnic and educational backgrounds. It is observed that, although ethnic shocks are variously motivated, the atypical shape and inequity in power and role distribution at the highest levels of executive office‐holding stand out as a salient source and target of antagonism by ethnic groups. This finding has a paradoxical implication: deep‐seated economic and political interests of the elite play a diversionary role from the real causes of ethnic conflicts in Nigeria.

Read the full article here.

29th ASEN Conference: Nationalism and Self-Determination

24-25 April 2018 at University of Edinburgh

The Paris Peace Conference of 1919 and the establishment of the League of Nations in 1920 mark key moments in the attempt to build an ‘international community’ to settle disputes between nation-states fairly and without resort to violence. It thus stands beside the Peace of Westphalia, or the Congress of Vienna as a landmark attempt to build a lasting peace after a protracted and highly destructive war.

Unlike these previous Eurocentric moments, Paris was a global affair dominated by the triumphant western powers. The decision to apply Woodrow Wilson’s principle of national self-determination to the territories of the defeated powers raised the question of its more general application. There were subjects of formal and informal colonial rule urging the extension of the principle (e.g., Ireland, China, Vietnam, India), as well as many states opposed (irredentist Italy, defeated Germany and Hungary, expansionist Japan, the new Soviet Union). Creating nation-states brought with it the problem of national minorities. Wilson had, in the words of his Secretary of State, opened a “Pandora’s box”.

This conference looks at the world of nation-states shaped, successfully or not, by the assumptions and the realpolitik of 1919 and its long aftermath. Its key themes focus on nationalism, nationalities, self-determination, national and ethnic minorities, and international relations over the last century and into the next. On the surface the principle of national self-determination has triumphed. In 1923 the League of Nations had 23 members, and much of the world was under formal imperial rule. Today there are 193 members of the United Nations – successor to the League – and formal empire has virtually disappeared. The events played out at Versailles sparked a wave of nationalism that is still resonating globally today.

The conference aims to explore the short and long term consequences of the events of 1919-20. In the short term there are issues such as creating nation-states, dealing with national minorities within those states, and managing the new international conflicts that were created. In the longer term there is the question of how and why the nation-state has come to be regarded as the key unit of the international community, and what this has meant for nationalism, national and ethnic identity, state sovereignty, and international relations.

The conference is intended to cover cases from all parts of the world and welcomes papers based on different theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches, and from different disciplines and fields, such as political science, sociology, history, IR and law.

Themes include:

  • The theory and practice of national self-determination
  • The destruction of empires and the construction of new nation-states
  • The Paris Peace Conference and League views on gender, class and race
  • Nationalism and opposition to the League of Nations
  • The (alternative) Bolshevik vision of nationhood
  • The League of Nations and minorities questions
  • The impact of national self-determination on inter-war empires
  • The fall of empires and the formation of nation-states after 1945
  • Evaluating the concept of national self-determination today
  • National identity as a precondition of statehood
  • The nation-state as the key objective of nationalist movements
  • Nations without states: nationalism opposed to existing nation-states

For more information see the conference website: https://asen.ac.uk/events/asen-annual-conference-2019/