Category Archives: Exhibition

Narrating the Road to, and Reality of, Multicultural Britain

This article follows the series on Art and nationalism.

T06947Two specific exhibits in London’s galleries have sought to tell the story of  the emergence of multicultural Britain, depicting a nation which journeyed through slavery, its abolition and the recognition of the new ‘natives’ of Britain: those of African and Indian descent, to arrive at a much glorified example of multi-cultural coexistence.

The first exhibit of significance, a permanent one, is at the National Portrait Gallery, an ‘Abolition Trail’1 addresses the reality of the individuals who perpetuated the slave trade and colonialism, as well as the political processes and activism which led to the abolition of slavery. It features the portrait of Ayuba Suleiman Diallo2, the earliest portrait of a freed slave and public figure, for which the gallery initiated a fund-raising campaign in 2010. Also, one can see the commemorative large scale painting “The Anti-Slavery Society Convention”3, 1840 by Benjamin Robert Haydon which is part of a narrative of reform and abolitionist movements in Britain. The newly commissioned portrait of Lord Ali in his robes on the ground floor presents us with the conclusion to the story of race relations in Britain, a black/ brown man reaching the heights of institutional belonging4.

Tate Britain meanwhile featured a non-permanent collection Art

Maud Sulter 1960-2008Polyhymnia (from the Zabat series)

Maud Sulter 1960-2008
Polyhymnia (from the Zabat series)

Displays: Thin Black Line(s)5, exhibited from 22 August 2011 – 18 March 2012.  It featured Lubaina Himid and Ingrid Pollard and is part of the gallery’s “one-room Focus Displays” which highlight “a theme or period of British art, using works from the Tate Collection”. This one represented the subaltern consciousness amongst black and Indian citizens of the new Britain, particularly women, in the aftermath of the end of colonialism. The paintings reflected upon Britain’s colonial past and a search for ‘roots’ and identity on the side of the artists.

Finally, the Tate Modern features two impressive paintings that juxtapose the classical art thematic of nudity and voyeurism with black subjects, reminding us of the usual absence of these bodies in early ‘high’ art and welcoming the possible discomfort that viewers might experience6.

In all the various displays present some of the ways in which the public space of the gallery is used as a tool for integrating the stories of Britain and multicultural Britain within a symbolic public arena, the gallery.

The paintings, in-depth description of the artist and subject matter can be seen in the gallery links below, copyright prevents us from featuring them here.

1. Abolition Trail at the National Portrait Gallery

2. Ayuba Suleiman Diallo display

Appeal for Ayuba Suleiman Diallo portrait in the Guardian newspaper

3. The National Slavery Convention 1840

4. Waheed in Lord’s robes 2009 by Julian Opie

5. ‘Thin Black Lines’ exhibition review

BP British Art Displays: Thin Black Line(s) (22 August 2011  –  18 March 2012)

This display focuses on the contribution of Black and Asian women artists to British art in the 1980s. Taking as its starting point three seminal exhibitions curated by artist Lubaina Himid in London from 1983 to 1985, the display charts the coming to voice of a radical generation of British artists who challenged their collective invisibility in the art world and engaged in their art with the wider social and political issues of 1980s Britain and the world.

In the early 1980s three exhibitions in London curated by Lubaina Himid – Five Black Women at the Africa Centre (1983), Black Women Time Now at Battersea Arts Centre (1983-4) and The Thin Black Line at the Institute for Contemporary Arts (1985) – marked the arrival on the British art scene of a radical generation of young Black and Asian women artists. They challenged their collective invisibility in the art world and engaged with the social, cultural, political and aesthetic issues of the time.

This display features a selection of key works by some of these artists. At their core is a conceptual re-framing of the image of black and Asian women themselves. Drawing on multiple artistic languages and media, these works repositioned the black female presence from the margins to the centre of debates about representation and art making.

( cited from the now gone description on the site, as well as from the curatorial text)

6.  Family Jules: NNN (No Naked Niggahs) by Barkley L. Hendricks

Agosta, the Pigeon-Chested Man, and Rasha, the Black Dove by Christian Schad

Art and Nationalism in London Museums: Representing Britain

This series examines how pieces of art in London museums speak to or about nationalism by representing or commenting on ‘the nation’. It presents an opportunity for the reader to not only consider the topic in relation to established artists and paintings, but also to plan a visit to the galleries in question in order to experience the pieces of art directly.

The galleries reviewed were The National Gallery, The National Portrait Gallery, Tate Britain and Tate Modern. Visits to the four couldn’t but lead to a reflection on their different purposes and ethos. Unlike the National Gallery and Tate Modern, references to “the nation” are particularly prominent in Tate Britain and the National Portrait Gallery. We are reminded of this for instance by the engraving (Image 1) when entering Tate Britain “These galleries were presented to the nation”.

Continue reading

Crimes against Humanity: An Exploration of Genocide and Ethnic Violence

by Sonia Morland

Background

The ‘Crimes against Humanity’ exhibition is located in the London Imperial War Museum, in a small space above the Holocaust exhibition. The exhibition is made up of two parts: a thirty minute film on genocides throughout the twentieth century and an interactive space  where visitors can research twentieth century genocides in greater detail.

Although the film has a distinctive beginning and end, viewers can start watching it whenever they arrive. Rather than giving a chronological account of violent ethnic conflicts, the film concentrates on the main themes apparent in genocides. It firstly considers genocide’s complex causes by discussing the various ways despotic  leaders in the twentieth century pitted neighbours against each other, paving the way for ethnic cleansing. The film then goes on to look at the way the world has responded to reports of ethnic violence abroad. Finally, it concentrates on how the perpetrators are punished – or not – and the aftermath for a country which has been ripped apart by brutal inter-ethnic fighting.

The exhibition is permanent and was opened in 2002. The team setting it up was advised by Dr Mark Levene, the only specialist academic teaching a course in comparative genocide at the time. Its purpose was, and continues to be, taking a closer look at why the last one hundred years have been so full of ethnic violence; for example, in World War One, 90% of the casualties were soldiers, but by the end of the twentieth century, 90% of various wars’ casualties were civilians.

 

In an exclusive interview with SEN Journal: Online Exclusives, Emily Fuggles, Research Officer at the Imperial War Museum, explains the background and aims of the ‘Crimes against Humanity’ exhibition in more detail:


1. Does the exhibition aim to have an impact on the way genocide is studied?

Our exhibition’s overall aim was to inform visitors to IWM, who may be coming to the museum with little prior knowledge of such conflicts, about the common features of ethnic violence through the film, and also to provide them with a database of different ethnic conflicts which summarises current research under key headings such as ‘Brief summary’, ‘Background’, ‘Course of events’ and ‘Recent developments’. We have therefore not specifically attempted to influence the way academics might approach the study of genocide.

2. Does the exhibition have its roots in any particular academic debate?

The exhibition does not have its roots specifically in one particular academic debate, although Dr Levene’s specialism is in comparative genocide, and the film does approach the subject in this way. Further information about Dr Levene’s approach to the study of ethnic conflict can be found here: http://www.soton.ac.uk/history/profiles/levene1.html .

3. How did you select the images and objects which you discussed in this exhibition?

The exhibition is predominantly dependent on photographs and film which Victoria Cook and October Films sourced from media agencies to illustrate the texts in the interactive and to present alongside the testimonies in the film.

 

Review

The very content of the ‘Crimes against Humanity’ exhibition has been the cause of much debate. The inclusion of a section focusing on the Armenian genocide has provoked, to date, over 2000 emails of complaint. There has also been contention over whether the exhibition goes too far in suggesting the persecution of indigenous people can be defined as genocide. These facts themselves show that no exhibition on such recent and shocking events can be entirely without controversy.

Although the exhibition aims to make its content accessible for all levels of knowledge, it also manages to go deeper by including a wealth of information on the fifteen main genocides of the twentieth century on interactive screens. Concentrating on the ethnic and nationalistic tensions which have lead to ethnic cleansing, its looks not only at well-studied genocides such as that in Rwanda in 1994, but also at those which are discussed less frequently, such as the Herero in Namibia and the ethnic conflict in Biafra.

The film itself is particularly interesting in its decision to never show the faces of the interviewees. Rather, when they talk, the film plays a mix of photographs and film clips, some of which are very graphic. At one point, the film weaves together clips of recently dead bodies and Rwandans announcing, “I am accused of genocide.” Whilst this is distressing, it clearly emphasises the message the exhibition is trying to get across: that genocides may culminate horrendously but that they always begin with ordinary people living in difficult situations.

My only criticism is that the benches for watching the film and using the interactive screens were rather uncomfortable; but, then again, overall discomfort is perhaps best for an exhibition that deals with some of the most harrowing and traumatic events of the last century.

All Images copyright of the Imperial War Museum.

 

The Imperial War Museum

Lambeth Road
London SE1 6HZ

http://www.iwm.org.uk/visits/iwm-london

Admission is free, though special exhibitions may charge an admission fee

Open daily 10am – 6pm
Last admission 5.45pm
Closed 19, 24, 25 and 26 December